Worth more than money
5 August 2014 8 Comments
At the moment, there isn’t a lot of glory for an academic in crowdfunding.
If you want to get promoted at a university, you need to secure funding from one of the key funding bodies in your country (the National Science Foundation in the USA, for example, or one of the Research Councils if you are in the UK, Canada, or Australia).
There is this dodgy hierarchy of funding with one or two national funding schemes at the top, followed by other national funding, then by other government funding, then industry/philanthropic funding (depending on your discipline). In that hierarchy, crowdfunding sits somewhere down the bottom, as a type of philanthropic funding.
Crowdfunding is a lot of work, and it isn’t work that most researchers are familiar with. It takes most people into areas where they may not be comfortable. At its heart, crowdfunding is a funding campaign and the two key tools are Facebook and Twitter. Not everybody wants to take their professional identity into Facebook. They might prefer to keep it as a personal realm (despite the fact that work leaks in). While they might be happy to build a professional identity on Twitter, for most academics this is new territory. Unsettling new territory.
The point of a funding campaign is to ask for money. That’s what the ‘funding’ bit means.
While academics are generally good at promoting their research, they aren’t good at asking their friends and family to give them money to fund their research. Often, they don’t understand why anyone would want to fund their work. They like it, and they see the benefit in it, but they’ve spent the better part of their lives explaining to Uncle Ted ‘exactly what is it that you do, again?’.
Given that most crowdfunding campaigns start by mobilising personal networks, that means not just explaining to Uncle Ted what the work is, but asking Uncle Ted to put his hand in his pocket and donate to it, and have him then tell all his friends to do the same. A lot of people feel uncomfortable about that.
I don’t shy away from these topics when encouraging people to try crowdfunding, which may explain why I haven’t had any takers at my university yet. Perhaps I should try to emphasize the positive side of a crowdfunding campaign. There are lots of positives to emphasise.
While crowdfunding is a lot of work, I don’t think that it is much more work than writing a major grant application. The difference is that the work for writing a major grant proposal happens before you submit the proposal, while the work for a crowdfunding campaign happens after you make your campaign live. It happens during the 4-8 week campaign period, plus about 2 weeks before while you get it ready. So, all up, about 10 weeks. A lot of people write their grant applications over a 6-10 week period, so that isn’t so different in scale.
But the work is very different. Writing a grant application is a combination of thinking, writing, doing some bureaucratic form filling, and pulling a team together. These are familiar tasks for most academics – even if they’ve never written an application before, they have the skills and they are surrounded by other people who also have those skills and are willing to advise them. Some people are willing to advise them, even if they don’t have the skills because they think they do. They are in a familiar milieu.
In contrast, running a crowdfunding campaign is very different type of work. It is about making a pitch video, a little bit of writing and planning, thinking up and valuing incentives, then being very active on social networks (primarily, Facebook and Twitter) and at live events, encouraging people to donate. These are skills that most academics don’t have (they need them, but they don’t know it yet). They don’t have them, their colleagues don’t have them, and possibly no-one they know has them.
So, crowdfunding is really a sekrit skill development program for academics. Your crowdfunding campaign is actually a crash course in the skills that you will need as a researcher in the 21st century.
When you are running that crowdfunding campaign and painfully learning how to be a l33t Facebooker and a Twitter-wizard, you are also networking, networking, networking.
In theory, academics have a natural network to draw upon: their past students. However, it doesn’t always work out that way. Finishing university is traditionally a time when people change their address, so mailing them might be hard. During their academic life, the university probably studiously ignored their personal email, preferring to give them a completely new university email address, which (by definition) doesn’t work any more. Even if it did, unsolicited email from past lecturers soliciting funds would definitely fall foul of anti-spam and privacy laws. Some students join alumni organizations, others don’t. Some academics make a point of friending their students on Facebook or LinkedIn. Others see it as a breach of ethics and don’t do it at all. There is some work to be done in building up those networks again.
But when it is built, what a network it is! It is a beautiful professional network, as a lot of those students will have gone on to get jobs in the industry that you teach into. It is of value to you, your colleagues, and your university’s alumni association. It is of value to the network itself, as it can be a professional networking opportunity for your past students, if you build it right.
So, your crowdfunding campaign is an exercise in reconnecting with your past students and building an industry network.
Some members of the network will (presumably) fund your crowdfunding campaign. That is, they will vote for your research with their wallet. That is a very, very powerful action to take. It is a vote for your project, and (in an abstract sense) a vote for research in general.
Most importantly, those people have publicly declared their interest in your research. They want to know more. They are a source of research subjects (if that is appropriate for your methodology and ethics considerations) and, through platforms that allow for crowdsourced data analysis, a potential group that will help you to massage, analyse, and crunch your resulting data. The best crowdfunded research projects are the ones that find ways for the crowd to contribute more than just money. Many of your crowdfunders will want to do that.
Your crowdfunders are also the perfect group to turn to when you want to disseminate your research findings, to get them out to the public and taken up by industry.
It is always nice to be able to say, “I heard about this great new thing.” How much nicer is it to be able to add “…and I helped fund it”?
When you look at it that way, it turns out that crowdfunding is not just about the money. It’s about the skills that you learn, the networks that you build, and the boost for the dissemination of your research. That’s got to be worth something.