6 September 2016 3 Comments
We solicited this post from a veteran researcher whose work has at times been under attack in the mainstream media. They have asked to remain anonymous, but wanted to share their experience and suggest constructive actions other researchers might take if they find themselves in a similar situation.
The actual research and researcher’s location is deliberately anonymised in this post.
We think the advice that’s offered here is insightful and very useful. Research into controversial topics needs to take place, and those who undertake it can run the risk of being targeted. It’s always good to have clarity about how much support you can count on from your institution – or networks – should something like this happen.
As academics, we quickly become used to people disagreeing with us.
Our families might disagree with how we spend our time. Our line managers might disagree with our research priorities. And granting bodies might disagree with the claim that our research should be funded. These are all par for the course in academic life.
Different, however, is when those outside of the academy disagree with us. Typically, when this occurs, it involves an ideological conflict between our values and those of others. When this conflict is heightened by particular debates over current social issues, this can result in considerable backlash against academics.
In my experience, such a backlash tends to take the following forms:
- Active attempts to discredit the research (e.g. through questioning methodology or interpretation of findings)
- Active attempts to discredit the researcher (e.g. through questioning their personal values or personal life)
- Active attempts to discredit research itself (e.g. through questioning academic pursuits as having any worth)
In certain cases, speaking back to the first form of backlash can be productive. This might involve working with your university’s media team to develop a statement that can be released to clarify any misperceptions. It can also involve selectively engaging with media outlets where you are likely to be given a fair opportunity to clarify any misperceptions.
To a certain extent, cases involving the third form of backlash can be ignored, given anti-intellectualism as an ideological position is difficult to counter through recourse to the merits of research, though recent examples demonstrate that there may be something to be gained by challenging anti-intellectualism.
Speaking back to attempts at discrediting us personally is something different altogether. Read more of this post